Making the GIS case to county registries is a fascinating exercise, to be sure. Given the facts on paper, it should be a slam dunk: reams of location-specific data in the form of deeds and registered surveys and easements and all manner of other documents; much of this content already scanned to high quality digital formats; and no existing geospatial linkages permitting this content to be queried and accessed from the GIS context.
So what to do? Obvious! Geotag these scanned documents with an x,y reference that makes it easy to expose them to geographic searches.
And yet... Maybe not so obvious. The registers themselves are admirably dedicated to the serioiusness of the job, which is protecting and maintaining the integrity of vital documents. Any technology or procedural change that threatens this process is rightfully suspect. So the concept of potentially contaminating documents with shoddy geographic referencing is no easy sell to make.
It warrants serious consideration though. As information technology increases access to public records, whole new categories of opportunites tend to arise. It would be rewarding to see the County Registries benefit from these opportunities.
Friday, September 5, 2008
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
enforced inefficiency
Even if plenty of resources are available to implement a statewide digital land records system; even if a seamless, fault tolerant, all inclusive technical plan is created and implemented; even if all data from all registries and municipalities throughout Maine could be marshalled into a database that allowed querying on any aspect of any parcel and its attributes - even then, the privacy issue would stand in the way.
As I spent some time this week on dirt camp roads and woods paths I wondered a lot about the benefits of not always having access to the straightest line or the widest road to get where one is going. If I do not need to spend time in a town office or deeds registry, to show my face or get to know local officials in the process of prospecting for property or investigating land, I free up resources that I and others would spend searching. So there is an efficiency gain. But is some interaction that may be beneficial from the local perspective, some check and balance of personal introduction and exposure to those keeping the records - is some element of this necessary to protect the land?
As I spent some time this week on dirt camp roads and woods paths I wondered a lot about the benefits of not always having access to the straightest line or the widest road to get where one is going. If I do not need to spend time in a town office or deeds registry, to show my face or get to know local officials in the process of prospecting for property or investigating land, I free up resources that I and others would spend searching. So there is an efficiency gain. But is some interaction that may be beneficial from the local perspective, some check and balance of personal introduction and exposure to those keeping the records - is some element of this necessary to protect the land?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)